How could this happen? The annual HOA dues were $400. Because she was two years in arrears, Ms. Blevins dropped off a check for $800 to the Association in August 2000. Because the HOA had already begun legal proceedings against her, it did not cash the check. Although the HOA tried to serve the required legal process on her, this was apparently always attempted after 7 PM when Ms. Blevins refused to open the door for fear of prowlers.
So on April 10, 2001, her home was sold in the lobby of a courthouse for $5,000. Of this total, $4,200 went towards late fees, interest and legal expenses. It seemed puzzling that were no competing bidders and the house was sold for this outstanding $5,000 debt.
If you think that was outrageous, how about this? In April 2005, Pamela Bernhardt, a 52-year old realtor, was finishing $48,000 in renovations on her two-story rental home which she and her husband owned free-and-clear. She arrived at the house and found a small, hand-written note posted on the front door. It notified her that the home had been sold at a foreclosure sale seven months earlier for nonpayment of a delinquent $420 assessment fee. The house sold for $1,600 with no other competitive bids.
Terry Sears, an attorney for the homeowners association, claimed that notices had been sent to Bernhardt by certified mail. Interviewed by the Houston Chronicle, Mrs. Bernhardt insisted that "I was never sent any notices." She went on to point out that "I would have paid the $420 before spending about $48,000 on renovations. She had put the house on the market for $269,900 and had two full-priced offers. It is worth noting that Mr. Sears had filed 99 HOA foreclosures in 1994.
A Brief History of Homeowners Associations
The forerunners of the contemporary homeowners association were the subdivisions of luxury homes for the wealthy which sprang up in the 1920s. Property deeds included what became known as restrictive covenants that prohibited owners from selling their property to anyone other than white people.
The modern homeowners association really developed under the heavy-handed guidance of the Federal Housing Authority (FHA). In the 1960s, the FHA promoted the HOA as a way of providing affordable homes to large numbers of people. The FHA issued guidelines and standards which required planned developments to have a non-profit homeowner association with mandatory membership in order to obtain FHA insurance.
Together with the building industry, the FHA also heavily promoted the use of covenants that attached to the property. These covenants included a lien for HOA assessments on property owners which led to the possibility of foreclosure for non-payment of assessed fees. In 1964, the Urban Land Institute published its Homes Association Handbook which provided model covenants for an HOA. One of the key authors was the chief of the land planning division of the FHA.
Another key organization was the Community Association Institute (CAI) which was established in 1973 to bring together all groups that had an interest in promoting HOAs and provide guidance for them. Over time, however, the CAI became dominated by the property management industry. In the 1990s it was reorganized as a 501(c)(6) tax-exempt non-profit business trade organization whose primary mission was to lobby state legislatures. Its major members were property management firms and attorneys.
In 1962, there were fewer than 500 homeowner associations in the entire nation. But the number of them has skyrocketed in the last thirty years. The overwhelming majority of new homes built since 1980 were put up in developments with an HOA which owners were required to join. Today, there are roughly 300,000 homeowner associations which heavily regulate the lives of nearly 60 million Americans.
Throughout the United States, homeowners associations impose very similar obligations. Anyone who wants to buy property in an HOA development must join the HOA. A Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Deed Restrictions (CC&Rs) lays out the obligations of the owner including restrictions which run with the deed when the property changes hands. This will often be included with the deed at the closing, but few purchasers ever read the lengthy document.
The Rules and Regulations will specify in great detail the dos and don'ts of behavior in the community. The governing boards can change or add to these "quality-of-life" rules and can impose fines for violations. Homeowners pay regular dues as well as "special assessments" and, in return, the HOA is required to maintain the common grounds.
Desperate HOAs in Florida Are Taking Desperate Actions
Most readers know that the foreclosure problem in Florida has reached epidemic proportions. What is not well-known is that this situation has dramatically impacted HOAs and driven them to take desperate measures.
Very often, homeowners who are unable or unwilling to continue making mortgage payments have already stopped paying their HOA assessments. Some HOAs are facing delinquency rates of 15% or more and have serious revenue shortfalls. These financially strapped HOAs are using whatever means are at their disposal for obtaining these delinquent fees. The most potent tool is the draconian measure of filing a foreclosure for the delinquent fee.
Foreclosure filings by HOAs have skyrocketed in the past two years. Florida law does not impose any minimum dollar thresholds which must be met before an HOA can foreclose. Most homeowners have no clue that the HOA can foreclose for delinquent assessments. When late fees, interest and attorney fees are added to the delinquent assessments, the total amount owed the HOA can run to several thousand dollars.
After a home is foreclosed and the owner evicted, HOAs are often renting out the property as a way to recover the overdue assessments. Because these houses often have first mortgages on them which are superior to the HOA's lien, the HOA foreclosure does not extinguish the lender's rights. The bank will eventually come in and foreclose on the HOA.
Investors looking to buy an HOA-foreclosed home on the cheap had better proceed carefully. An article posted in November 2009 on the website of Stephanie Lim, a Jacksonville realtor, recounted the plight of an investor who had purchased one of these homes at a great price. Unfortunately, the investor had not been aware that the bank could foreclose on the property, which it had begun to do. Because the names of the new owners were not on the note, the bank refused to talk to the distraught couple.
The HOAs have become so desperate that their powerful lobby in the legislature just pushed through a law which obligates tenants in homes where the owner is delinquent on the HOA assessment to pay the assessment directly to the HOA and then deduct that amount from the rent due the landlord. Incredibly, if the tenant fails to pay these assessments, the HOA can sue for eviction just as the landlord has the right to do. Renters in Florida had better take notice of this.
Arizona - Let the Buyer Beware
In May 2006, the Arizona Republic reported what happened to Stacy Mobbs, who had accumulated delinquent HOA dues of $343.02. After ignoring delinquent notices until the previous September, Mobbs received notice of a lien which her HOA had filed against her in Superior Court. In response, she brought a cashier's check for the full amount due -- $1,479.68 - to the HOA office where she was given a receipt showing that the balance had been paid in full.
Within days, the HOA's attorney had the check returned to her. He explained that the HOA had no right to collect the money and that she actually owed even more. Mobbs requested that she be allowed to bring the matter directly to the HOA board at its next meeting. The attorney refused the request and sent her emails indicating that she could speak only to him.
Fed up with these actions, Mobbs filed a civil suit as well as a complaint against the attorney with the state Bar in March 2006. Finally, the Superior Court judge ruled on May 12 that Mobbs had to pay the delinquent dues plus interest - a total of $370. He ruled that the attorney could collect no attorney's fees.
In an unusual action, the judge also included an entry in which he called the case "an example of the risk to the public of abusive litigation practices gone amok. The court is simply a forum for the resolution of disputes, not a weapon to be used to generate leveraged fee awards." He also forwarded this entry describing the attorney's conduct to the state Bar.
Did this judicial chastisement have any effect on HOAs and their attorneys in Arizona? Not at all. This past April, the Arizona Republic published an article which began by pointing out that "Financially distressed residents are learning the hard way that they can't walk away from homeowners association assessments even if their homes are in foreclosure or part of a bankruptcy."
The author explained that a growing number of lawsuits seeking to recover overdue assessments as well as attorney's fees were working their way through courts in Maricopa County where Phoenix is located. She noted that distressed homeowners who had stopped paying on their mortgage were also no longer paying their HOA assessments without realizing the possible consequences.
The author cited the example of Paul Cox, a former commercial real estate agent whose income had plunged because of the collapse in the market. When he could no longer pay the mortgage, he moved out of his house and filed for bankruptcy. His debts were discharged in U.S. Bankruptcy Court in the spring of 2009 and he believed the nightmare was pretty much over. Wrong.
The homeowner association is suing him for more than $1,300 in legal fees and unpaid HOA assessments that accumulated after the bankruptcy because the lender had not yet foreclosed on the mortgage. Thus Cox was still the owner of record. One of the justices remarked that "I rarely saw these kinds of cases two years ago; now I'm seeing two or three a day."
One day after this article appeared, an attorney recommended in a brief Internet posting that those homeowners who expected to lose their home delay filing for bankruptcy until after the bank had actually foreclosed. By doing this, the debt owed to the HOA can be discharged during the bankruptcy proceedings and no new, additional HOA dues will accumulate after the bankruptcy ended.
Texas - Epicenter for the HOA Foreclosure Mess
It was no accident that the two examples of HOA foreclosures cited at the beginning of this article occurred in Texas. Without a doubt, Texas has become the epicenter for HOA foreclosures. Part of the reason is the tremendous population growth of the state since 1980, second only to Florida. This surge in population led to enormous homebuilding and nearly all of these homes were in subdivisions with homeowner associations that all owners were compelled to join. Today, there are roughly 30,000 HOAs in Texas.
If Texas is the epicenter of the HOA foreclosure debacle, Houston and Harris County where it is located is ground zero. A website founded by Beanie Adolph nearly ten years ago and whose database research is done by volunteers has researched what has been occurring in the Houston metro area. The following chart, posted on its website, reveals its findings.
The website points out that the data includes very few foreclosure cases from the Justice of the Peace courts and no nonjudicial foreclosure cases whatsoever. Because the website operators have good evidence that nonjudicial foreclosures actually outnumber judicial foreclosures, the complete annual number for foreclosure filings in Harris County is very likely more than double the count which appears in this chart.
This website also has detailed statistics on which attorneys are filing the most HOA foreclosures. Without revealing specific names, here is what the numbers for the top ten attorney filers look like through 2007.
Notice the incredible number of filings for the top two attorneys. It is not an exaggeration to suggest that they have been running HOA foreclosure mills in the Houston area.
It would be a mistake to think that the HOA foreclosure crisis in Texas is limited to Harris County. Take a look at the following table which lists foreclosure filings by type in Dallas and its surrounding counties for May 2010.
There is one last horror story that is worth noting. Mike Clauer was a captain in the National Guard serving in Iraq in 2009 when he received a frantic call from his wife. She notified him that their homeowners association in Frisco, outside of Dallas, had foreclosed on the house because of delinquent assessments.
According to Mrs. Clauer, she had "gotten into a funk" over her husband's deployment in Iraq, had let the mail pile up, and had failed to pay bills. The Servicemembers Civil Relief Act passed by Congress in 2003 prohibited nonjudicial foreclosures against military personnel fighting overseas. However, the publicist hired by the HOA claimed that they had checked with the military and had been notified that he was not on active duty. He went further and claimed that the HOA received a certificate from the military stating that Clauer was not even in the military.
The home was foreclosed by the HOA in the spring of 2009 and was sold for $3,201. Since the house had been owned free-and-clear by the Clauers, the new owner quickly resold the house for $135,000.
According to a June 27 article in the Dallas Morning News, the Clauers have been allowed to continue living in their house under a judge's order. The week before the article appeared, a federal district judge ordered all the parties to get together to try to reach some kind of settlement.
Conclusion - The Battle Between HOAs and Homeowners Goes On
Although the HOA foreclosure crisis is clearly concentrated in the states of Texas, Florida, Arizona and California, the problem is not limited to these states. Some 33 states permit a nonjudicial HOA foreclosure. Unfortunately, we have no reliable statistics on how many of these HOA foreclosure filings actually lead to seizure and sale of the home. The CAI claims that the percentage is very small. Perhaps.
The fact that HOAs are able to file the foreclosure as a threat and then collect several thousand dollars in late fees, interest, fines and attorney fees for a delinquency that may total only $300-$600 has led critics to describe the situation as nothing more than a "shakedown racket."
Homeowners are getting organized in their opposition. The leader of one group, the National Homeowners Advocate Group, wrote a plea to President Obama in February 2009 asking for his help. In her letter, she said that "This foreclosure racket is slowly creeping across the country."
Has the HOA foreclosure option led to the creation of an extortion racket? Judge for yourself.


Comments on this Story
HOAGOV | 07/28/10 10:10 AM | Reply
In this excellent fact based article by Keith, he does not delve into the dynamics underlying this right of HOAs to foreclose. The reader needs to understand the legal scheme underlying HOAs, found both in the adhesion CC&R "agreement" and the pro-HOA state laws that allow the loss of homeowner rights, all for the survival of the HOA.
Then there are:
1. the practices of the HOA and HOA attorneys who often co-operate beyond what one would consider legal or ethical, the failure of HOA management, and the failure to stress the need for reserves for bad debts by the self-proclaimed educator of HOAs, CAI, , which it uses in its own finanial statements.
2. the constitutional concerns about cruel and unusual punishment since the damages to the homeowner, loss of all equity in his home, far exceed the money owed the HOA.
3. the discrminatory nature of HOA foreclosure -- being in second position, it is only practicable for the HOA to foreclose on homeowner who have a lot of equity in their homes to cover their second place position after the lender.
See pvtgov.wordpress.com and search on Foreclosure.
HOA4444 | 07/28/10 11:47 AM | Reply
The horrible examples in the article certainly shows examples of bad HOA management and greedy attorneys. But, it begs the question: How are HOAs to pay their legitimate bills (landscape, electricity, water, etc) if folks do not pay their assessments?
If some do not pay, then the burden falls (unfairly) on the remaining.. And the latter then conclude "if he does not pay. then I won't" and the financal situation goes to pot. There has to be a way to proceed to collect unpaid assessments. Who has a suggestion on how to handle these situations better? Just answering "negotiate with the owner" is not sufficient, because the problem is precisely those cases where negotiaton has failed to produce a conclusion. Foreclosure (or the threat) seems to be the only possible last resort.
I'm on an HOA board faced with paying those bills -- we board members need help on how to deal with these situations better. We would love to not proceed with foreclosure and be involved with the greedy attorneys. But we have bills to pay. Can not someone come up with a better solution?
Scott Petersen | 07/28/10 5:35 PM | Reply
Full disclosure: I am an attorney that regularly represents HOAs and condo associations in foreclosure cases in Florida. First of all, the author is in some sense comparing apples to snow tires. The laws of HOA foreclosures in Texas, I am informed, are immensely more favorable for HOAs than are the laws in Florida. In particular, Texas allows nonjudicial foreclosures for HOAs, which avoids many of the due process protections owners have in Florida. Moreover, the author neglects to mention the several statutory notices that HOAs must send the owner prior to initiating a foreclosure action, as well as the fact that the owner must be personally served with the complaint in order to begin the foreclosure process. It's not as if an HOA attorney in Florida can "sneak one by" the owner. Certainly, HOAs are increasingly resorting to foreclosing their liens, but it is mainly because the banks are taking so long to foreclose that the HOAs have little choice but to foreclose and rent the property out while the bank foreclosure case is proceeding. The statutory cap on recovering past due assessments from banks that claim title as a result of foreclosure ensures that HOAs lose thousands of dollars in unpaid assessments while the bank takes its own sweet time in foreclosing the mortgage. Lastly, while there is as the author notes a new statute allowing HOAs to proceed against tenants to collect unpaid assessments (and, yes, proceed with eviction if the tenant fails to pay), this again is a "remedy" that forces the HOA to go out-of-pocket to spend attorney's fees trying to collect from an owner who is a) not paying his mortgage, b) not paying his assessments while at the same time c) collecting rent from his tenant. You'll pardon me if I don't have a lot of sympathy for an owner in such a position. As for the tenant who is sometimes innocently caught in the crossfire, while I sympathize, in my experience, most tenants flee the moment they get wind of a foreclosure action. I doubt very many, if any at all, will actually face eviction as a result of the new law. Even if they do, there's not exactly a shortage of rentals here in Florida at the moment.
resp_dvlpmnt | 07/30/10 6:17 PM | Reply
Spoken like a true lawyer Scott making his living off this industry. What you seemed to miss is the point he was making but what is new about that. Misdirection is the standard in your field of choice. Jurow's concern was simple and one that the other 46 states need to pay attention to and that is the direction TX, Fla, CA and AZ are heading and the many, many victims it is creating during these or any economic times. Nothing like a feeding frenzy on the steps of the court house over someones former home. Recently a top lawyer-author from the TCREA/CAI lobby group was arrested in Houston on federal child pornography charges. It's a very interesting story and seems to bring to light much about a man that has been listed as one of our top HOA foreclosure attorneys and many of the local politicians he engages with. Many of his associates make the same arguments you do (as does he).:
http://abclocal.go.com/ktrk/story?section=news/local&id=7488469
"As for the tenant who is sometimes innocently caught in the crossfire, while I sympathize, in my experience, most tenants flee the moment they get wind of a foreclosure action. I doubt very many, if any at all, will actually face eviction as a result of the new law. Even if they do, there's not exactly a shortage of rentals here in Florida at the moment." I found this one particularly insensitive. Congratulations. You are a good CAI man!
Scott Petersen replied to resp_dvlpmnt | 08/03/10 9:11 AM | Reply
@resp_dvlpmnt, who is the "victim?" The person who doesn't pay his or her assessments, or the members of the association that have their dues increased to make up for the loss? What remedy do you suggest for the HOA? The Florida legislature protects the banks via a statutory cap on unpaid assessments if the bank takes title in foreclosure, but there is no provision for paying the assessments while the banks take, literally, years to foreclose. That doesn't hurt the owner, who isn't paying his dues while the bank forecloses, and doesn't hurt the bank, which doesn't have to pay in the interim. It only hurts the HOA. So, again, the question: what remedy do you propose for the HOA?
It's easy to throw around ad hominem attacks, but not so easy to understand what you're talking about and propose real solutions. As for my alleged "insensitivity" to tenants, I deal with tenants every day of the week. I would guess 9 out of 10 tenants leave as soon as there is a hint of foreclosure (either by the bank or the HOA). Why? Most don't want to bother with it and, the truth is, they don't have to. Rentals are widely available in Florida these days. That's not insensitive. That's a fact.
richflocker | 08/21/10 2:53 PM | Reply
Just like racial covenants and bans on satellite dishes, these "restrictive covenants" that demand eternal money payment to these developer-created "private governments" need federal legislation to render them void. Contracts that compel money to be paid for eternity are unconstitutional (violate the rule against perpetuties) when they "automatically renew".
This legislation should apply only to detached home property, not condominiums. A man's home is his castle and we should be able to own our homes "free and clear" after we've paid off the mortgage. Then we should only have taxes and maintenance...and of course we mow our own grass, pay for our own paint, mend our fences at our own expence and pay for our own electricity, water, cable, etc.
There needs to be term limits imposed on developer-created "governing regimes" and the HOA corporate charters with all these "contract terms" should be limited to 10 years MAX, and be renewed or re-instituted only if at least 75% of the present day owners agree to renew the "contracts" that require payment of money. These contracts could even include foreclosure or anything else that the people "agree to" by democratic process (see TX property code 201 for a great process, but this process is carefully written by the HOA industry so that they never have to follow it! Because of blatant conflicts of interest in the law-making process).
The claim that homeowners "agree to these contracts when they buy a home" is fraudulent due to the monopolizing of the housing industry by the HOA industry. They are in bed together, and the HOA lawyers write all the CC&RS for the big housing mills so they only produce HOA housing to insure a cash stream for HOA industry.
Democratic choice (to have a mandatory HOA contract or to have a voluntary HOA civic club with no lien or foreclosure powers) is the key, and without the approval of the people by 75% at least once each 10 years the non-profit status and the rights granted the regime by the developer should dissolve.
richflocker | 08/21/10 9:15 PM | Reply
Correction - last paragraph change the word "and" to "or".
Either they are "for-profit business" and contractually obligated to provide contracted services and protections in accordance with the "contract" or they are a voluntary, benevolent non-profit corporation working from donations and community service hours.
They can't have their cake and eat it too., we currently see unregulated and widespread plundering of "homeowners" by these "non-profit corporations" run amok. The FHA is considering not backing loans to properties infected with restrictive covenant transfer fees.
I hope they outlaw any covenant that runs with the land that demands money payments for more than 10 years from creation, and outlaw automatic renewals.
When HOA lobbyists get involved with these issues we have seen legislation that enables these practices rather than regulate or render them void. We must be vigilant and prevent this from happening as the legislatures of the several states, especially Texas, reform the laws pertaining to these financial instruments on homestead properties.
The foreclosure predators have shown their true colors and written most of the legislation since ~1984. The time has come to end the abuse and cut off the financial flow of wealth to this ring of organized crime.
"When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men living together in society, they create for themselves in the course of time a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that justifies it."
Frederic Bastiat
richflocker | 08/21/10 9:22 PM | Reply
"Without the approval of the people by 75% at least once each 10 years the non-profit status *OR* the rights granted the regime by the developer should dissolve."
-General Idea
Leave a comment